2026:JHHC:7691 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 995 of 2023 ----- Enamul Haque, S/o Abdul Mazid, R/o Bangla Toli Pundag, P.O. Pundag, P.S. Argora, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.State of Jharkhand 2.Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 3.Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi 4.Circle Officer, Nagri, P.O. & P.S. Nagri, District Ranchi 5.Officer Incharge, Pundag Police State, P.O. & P.S. Pundag, Ranchi … Respondent(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saurav Mahto, AC to G.P.-I …...... 15 / 19.03.2026: Petitioner is challenging the initiation of BPLE Case No.21/2017- 18, on the ground of the same being without jurisdiction and the land is settled land. 2. Since, only a notice has been issued to the petitioner, I am not inclined to interfere in the proceeding. 3. The petitioner may highlight his defence by filing reply, along with document if any before the authority concerned, who will consider the same and thereafter will pass an appropriate order as per law after hearing the parties. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that without passing any final order, the petitioner cannot be dispossessed. 6. Once the order is passed, the same should be communicated within 48 Hours to the petitioner. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19th March, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 20/03/2026