Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37794 (CHH)

SAMEER KUMAR v. SHASHIL (SUSHIL KUMAR)

MA/39/2024 · 2026-09-30

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010126042024 2026:CGHC:42856 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 39 of 2024 Sameer Kumar S/o Late Chimman Lal Aged About 63 Years R/o State Bank of India Gali, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Dist. Bilaspur, (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1. Shashil (Sushil Kumar) S/o Late Chimman Lal Aged About 65 Years R/o Indira Colony, Near Tarbahar Naka, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Dist. Bilaspur, C.G. 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Sudeep Verma, Advocate. For Respondent No. 2/State : Mr. Anand Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput , Judge Order on Board 01.10.2026 1. Heard Mr. Sudeep Verma, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Anand Gupta, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for respondent No. 2/State. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 02.03.2024 passed by the Fourth Additional District Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 22A/2024, titled as Sameer Kumar Versus Shashil Kumar (Sushil Kumar) & Another, whereby the learned Court has dismissed ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Date: 2026.10.01 18:15:50 +0530 2 the application preferred by the present appellant/plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking interim injunction. 3. Mr. Verma, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant appeal. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, the permission, as prayed for, is granted. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. The interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Abhishek