Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37793 (CHH)

TUKARAM SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7143/2026 · 2026-09-27

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 CGHC010372062026 2026:CGHC:42104 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7143 of 2026 Tukaram Sahu S/o Shri Manshram Sahu Aged About 46 Years Occupation - Service (Class - I V Employee/ Chowkidar), Presently Working At Post Matric Adivasi Balak Chhatrawas, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh R/o Ward No. 4, Ambagarh Chowki, District Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal And Scheduled Caste Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Office, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 3. Collector District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Aniruddha Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Dy. G.A. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 28/09/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is presently working as a Peon and, vide order dated 30.06.2025, has been transferred from the Post-Matric Tribal Boys Hostel, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon to the Pre-Matric Tribal Hostel, Ambagarh Chowki-K-1, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki. It is further submitted that although the transfer order was passed on 30.06.2025, the petitioner has not yet been relieved from his JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.09.29 10:31:25 +0530 2 / 2 present place of posting and, consequently, has not been permitted to join at his transferred place of posting. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has also submitted a representation before respondent No.2 vide Annexure P-3 dated 25.08.2025, which is still pending consideration and prays that the same may be decided. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that in case the petitioner has submitted such representation, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent No.5, in accordance with law, within a period of 25 days. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. In view of the submission made by learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 to consider and decide the representation dated 25.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of 25 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s claim. The competent authority shall consider the representation independently and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Jyoti