Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37792 (PNJ)

MANJIT KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/41804/2026 · 2026-08-26

Sumeet Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (145) CRM-M-41804-2026 (O&M) Manjit Kaur ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and another ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 26.08.2026 Date of uploading: 26.08.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner (s). Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Amarinder Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral): 1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus: “It is therefore prayed that present petition may kindly be allowed & case FIR No. 6 (Annexure P-1) dated 28.01.2020 registered u/s 420, 120-B IPC (318(4), 61(2), BNS) at PS Mehal Kalan, District Barnala & all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 21.04.2026 (Annexure P-2).” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand, with liberty to file afresh, in case cause of action so ensues, as also liberty to file an appropriate compounding application etc. before the concerned Court. 3. Ordered accordingly. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.08.26 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh. CRM-M-41804-2026 (O&M) -2- 4. In case, any compounding application is filed, the same shall be ratiocinated upon in accordance with law, by the concerned Court. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) August 26, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.08.26 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.