Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37786 (CAL)

GOLAPI KHATUN v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/23173/2026 · 2026-09-02

Suvra Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.09.2026 rc/ct.no.15 Item No.28 WPA No. 23173 of 2026 Golapi Khatun Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Adv. Kumar Jyoti Tewari Adv. Manas Kumar Das Adv. Amrit Sinha Adv. Aniruddha Tewari Adv. Aritra Thobdar ..for the petitioner Adv. Manasi Mukherjee Adv. Palash Bapari …for the State Adv. Alokesh Dalai Adv. Sawant Chanda Adv. Rima Mondal…for the respondent nos. 8 to 12 Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. The petitioner who is the Pradhan of Godda Gram Panchayat has assailed the no confidence motion submitted by the private respondents/members of the Panchayat on August 17, 2026 seeking her removal on the ground that motion contains stigma. Learned counsel for the private respondents candidly submits that the motion contains stigma and cannot be sustained. In view thereof, the motion submitted by the private respondents on August 17, 2026 is set aside/ quashed. All consequential steps taken by the Prescribed Authority pursuant to the said motion are also set aside/quashed. However, liberty is granted to the private respondents to submit a fresh motion before the Prescribed Authority in terms of Section 12 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. In the event such motion is submitted, the Prescribed Authority shall act in terms of the said provisions of law, particularly the timeframe stipulated therein. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh,J) 2