- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010465142025 NC: 2026:KHC:47651 RP No. 289 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL REVIEW PETITION NO. 289 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT.SIDDAMMA, W/O LATE BORAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, TIN TEA SHOP BY THE SIDE OF JAMIYA MASJID, NORTH WESTERN SIDE, NAYAKANAHATTY VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 522. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA R. SWAMY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. JAMIYA MASJID, NAYAKANAHATTY, CHALLAKERE TALUK, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT ALHAZ N.H. MOHAMMED MOOSA, S/O MOHAMMED HUSSAIN, SINCE DEAD BY SRI MOHAMMAD SAB YUSUF, S/O K. MOHAMMED SAB, PRESIDENT OF JAMIYA MASJID, NAYAKANAHATTY VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010465142025 NC: 2026:KHC:47651 RP No. 289 of 2025 BY PRESIDENT SYED ANWAR, S/O LATE SYED UBEDULLA SAB, MAJOR, PRESIDENT OF JAMIYA MASJID, NAYAKANAHATTY VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 522. 2. SYED NASURULLA, S/O SYED ISMAIL, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SECRETARY, JAMIYA MASJID, NAYAKANAHATTY TIMBER MERCHANT AND AGRICULTURIST, R/O NAYAKANAHATTY VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 522. 3. ABOOBAKAR SIDIQ, S/O LATE IBRAHIM SAB, AGE: MAJOR, SECRETARY JAMIYA MASJID, NAYAKANAHATTY VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 522. 4. PATTANA PANCHAYAT, NAYAKANAHATTI. BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER, NAYAKANAHATTY VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 522. …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010465142025 NC: 2026:KHC:47651 RP No. 289 of 2025 THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION.114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.03.2024, PASSED IN RSA NO. 756/24 AT ANNEXURE A AFTER REHEARING ARGUMENTS OF BOTH THE PARTIES AND PASS ANY OTHER RELIEFS DEEMED FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused I.A.No.1/2025. 2. No grounds are made out to condone the delay. 3. That apart, the grounds urged in the review petition is in the nature of re-agitation of the grounds of appeal, which is impermissible in law. No errors apparent on the face of the record pointed out. 3. Hence, I.A.No./12025 and the review petition is dismissed. SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE GH/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4