SOURAV BISWAS @ SACHIN BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/1733/2026 · 2026-09-02
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37765 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37765 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
02.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.281. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (M) 1733 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dhantala Police Station case no. 1101 of 2025 dated 28.12.2025 under Sections 105/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And In the matter of : Sourav Biswas @ Sachin Biswas
……Petitioner. Mr. Khalid Hasan Mr. Subhendu Das
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Somnath Adhikary Ms. Aishwarya Madhushree
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for a period of nine months and is not the principal accused who inflicted the vital blow. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is the principal accused who inflicted the vital blow. I find from the materials on record that the victim expired after two days of the incident and charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 105 of the BNS. Having considered the overall circumstances of the case and particularly the period of detention and the time which will be required to take the trial to its logical conclusion, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.
2 Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Sourav Biswas @ Sachin Biswas shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (M) No. 1733 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)