143 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10615-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.09.2026 Vijay alias Mundu ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ******* RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that a representation Annexure P-1 filed by the petitioner for premature release has till date not been decided and at this stage of the proceedings, the petitioner will be contented if a direction to decide the said representation within a time bound schedule is issued. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and makes a statement at Bar that keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, he does not intend to file response to the petition in question. However, he states that the representation Annexure P-1 filed by the petitioner shall be disposed off by the respondents within a period VISHNU 2026.09.02 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CRWP-10615-2026 (O&M) -2- of 30 days from today. 4. In view thereof, nothing survives in the present petition. It as well as interim application/s, if any, stand/s disposed off. [ RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ] 02.09.2026 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHNU 2026.09.02 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh