Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37763 (CAL)

AMAR KOLEY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

WPA/1070/2011 · 2026-09-01

Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01.09.2026 Ct. No. 655 S.L. No.24 AMR WPA 1070 of 2011 Amar Koley -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Srijan Nayak Ms. Rituparna Maitra …for the WBSEDCL 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Advocate representing the WBSEDCL is present. 3. It is said by the learned Advocate for the Corporation that the instant writ petition has become infructuous as supply of electricity had already been given to the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the instant case be and the same is hereby dismissed for default. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. No order as to costs. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on payment of requisite fees. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)