21. BA] SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3186 BA2 No.21 of 2026 Shadab Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.429 of 2023 under Section 302 of IPC, registered at P.S. Piran Kaliyar, District Haridwar, Uttarakhand. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the FIR incised wound was mentioned on the neck but in the post mortem report of the deceased there is no incised wound, which creates a doubt in the prosecution story; there is huge contradiction in the statements of the informant as she denied the prosecution version in her cross examination. He submits that there is no recovery from the possession and pointing out of the applicant and applicant has no criminal history. He further submits that in case applicant is released on bail, there are no chances of his absconding. 6. Learned State counsel has opposed the bail application. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Shadab be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 28.04.2026 Arti