AMARJEETO v. STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
CWP/27425/2026 · 2026-08-27
Namit Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37758 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37758 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CWP-27425-2026 Date of decision : 27.08.2026 Amarjeeto
….Petitioner V/S State of Punjab and others
….Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Kamal Narula, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, A.A.G., Punjab. **** NAMIT KUMAR
, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to make the payment of remaining retiral benefits of the petitioner along with interest from the date of her retirement till date with immediate effect.
2. On receipt of advance copy of the petition, Mr. Rehat Bir Singh Mann, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 & 5 and on instructions, submits that the remaining retiral dues of the petitioner comprising of approximate amount of Rs.12,00,000/- along with reasonable rate of interest on the said payment as well as on the payment already released i.e. Rs.9,39,462/-, shall be released to the petitioner within a period of 06 weeks from today.
3. In view of the said statement, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition.
4.
Disposed of as having not been pressed.
5. Needless to mention here that respondents No.4 & 5 shall be bound by the statement given before this Court. 27.08.2026
(NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.08.27 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document