Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37756 (KAR)

SMT P R AKKAMAHADEVI v. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT

WP/9955/2022 · 2026-09-02

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010196502022 NC: 2026:KHC:47793 WP No. 9955 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 9955 OF 2022 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SMT. P.R.AKKAMAHADEVI, D/O. P.V.RAJASHEKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.17, 3RD CROSS, SHAMANNA GARDEN, ADUGODI POST, BENGALURU-560030. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATEESH N.KOTTALAGI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRIKANTH M.P., ADVOCATE) AND: KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT, CENTRAL DIVISION, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NOW REPRESENETED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C., K.H. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560027. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. RENUKA H.R., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010196502022 NC: 2026:KHC:47793 WP No. 9955 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Satish N.Kottalagi., counsel on behalf of Sri.Srikanth.M.P., for the petitioner and Smt.Renuka.H.R., counsel for respondent appeared in person. 2. This petition is filed seeking following reliefs: (i) Direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 25.03.2021 in terms of the order dated 12.12.2019 vide Annexure-Q passed by this Hon'ble Court on W.P.No.35249/2019 connected with W.P.No.48363/2018 vide Annexure-V. (ii) Direct the respondents to refix the pay of the petitioner properly and pay all arrears of salary along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. and to continue to provide the quarters facility as directed by the Hon'ble III Additional Labor Court, Bengaluru by its award dated 17.02.2018 vide Annexure-M. (iii) Direct to pay costs of the litigation. (iv) Pass any order of consequential relief or any other appropriate order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010196502022 NC: 2026:KHC:47793 WP No. 9955 of 2022 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of directing the respondent - Corporation to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 25.03.2021. 4. Counsel for the Corporation submits that if an order is passed, the Corporation will consider the representation in accordance with the law. 5. Submission made on behalf of the respective parties is placed on record. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Corporation to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with the law, within four weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31