Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:3055
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ABA No.6750 of 2025
Bhola Mahto Bhola Saw, aged about 40 years, Son of Kitak Saw, Resident of Chepa Khurd, Chepakalan, P.O. Chepakalan, P.S. Barkagaon Dist.-Hazaribag
…. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl. P.P. ------
2/05.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 198/2025, for the offence U/s 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. and Sections 21, 22, 23 of Banning Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, pending in the Court of Learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribag.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that petitioner has no role whatsoever in running, managing, controlling or operating the alleged company Aryakarta Nidhi Ltd. He also submits that the petitioner has not taken any money.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that innocent persons have been cheated and huge amount to the tune of Rs.1,13,66, 936/- have been misappropriated and the name of the petitioner is published in the bond showing that the petitioner is the shareholder.
5. It is alleged that a sum of Rs.1,13,66,936/- have been
2026:JHHC:3055
2
misappropriated by way of taking the money by inducement from innocent persons and the petitioner is said to be shareholder of the said company, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is hereby rejected and disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 05.02.2026 R.Kumar