Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37734 (KAR)

BODA VEERANNA v. MANGALORE REFINERY AND PETRO CHEMICALS LTD

WP/5849/2017 · 2026-08-28

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010223152017 NC: 2026:KHC:46600 WP No. 5849 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 5849 OF 2017 (S-RES) BETWEEN: BODA VEERANNA S/O BITCHYA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, WORKING AS MANAGER(OPERATIONS) ,MANGALORE REFINERY AND PETRO CHEMICAL LTD., BALA VILLAGE, VIA KATIPALLA, MANGALORE-575030, AND R/AT NO.202, SUPRASADA APARTMENTS, IDYA VILLAGE, SURATHKAL, MANGALORRE DISTRICT-575014. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ALLURI RAGHU RAMA AURAVA, ADVOCATE; SRI. NARAYANA BHAT M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MANGALORE REFINERY AND PETRO CHEMICALS LTD., REP. BY ITS GROUP GENERAL MANAGER(HR), MRPL., BALA VILLAGE, VIA KATIPALLA, MANGALORE-575030. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.R. KAMALA CHARAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRADEEP S. SAWKAR , ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010223152017 NC: 2026:KHC:46600 WP No. 5849 of 2017 THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH PARA 2 OF THE COMMUNICATION BEARING NO. MRPL/HR/ESTT/2016 DATED 1.12.2016 ANNEXURE-G BY WHICH THE RESPONDENT HAS DEMANDED NOC FROM THE LEGAL HEIRS AS ULTRA VIRES AND ILLEGAL AND OPPOSED TO ARTICLES 14, 16, 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for sometime, submits that the respondent has already complied with the claim of the petitioner. He further seeks liberty to be reserved to the petitioner to submit a representation seeking promotion and payment of arrears of back wages. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010223152017 NC: 2026:KHC:46600 WP No. 5849 of 2017 4. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondent. If such representation is submitted, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22