SRI R K MANJUNATH v. M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
WP/23016/2026 · 2026-08-28
Suraj Govindaraj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37733 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37733 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010505422026 NC: 2026:KHC:46593 WP No. 23016 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 23016 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. R.K. MANJUNATH S/O R.V. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT RONURU VILLAGE, RONURU HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 135. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. L. VENKATARAMA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN REGISTERED OFFICE AT INDIAN OIL BHAVAN G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI - 400 051, MAHARASHTRA.
2.
SENIOR DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED.
3.
DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES HEAD, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED.
THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 HABE THEIR
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010505422026 NC: 2026:KHC:46593 WP No. 23016 of 2026
OFFICE AT INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, BANGALORE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NO. 28, 1ST FLOOR, ANJUMAN KAY ARR TOWER, P. KALINGA RAO ROAD, (MISSION ROAD) BENGALURU - 560 027, KARNATAKA.
ALSO AT INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., (MARKETING DIVISION), INDIAN OIL BHAVAN, NO. 22, MAHADEVAPURA, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, KR PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 016, KARNATAKA.
4.
CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES SAFETY ORGANISATION (PESO) OFFICE AT A-BLOCK, 5TH FLOOR, CGO COMPLEX, SEMINARY HILLS, NAGPUR - 440 006, MAHARASHTRA.
5.
MR. B.N. KRISHNA REDDY RAMAKRISHNA EXTENSION, SRINIVASPUR TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 135, KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. AISWARAYA HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI. MAHESH ARKALGUD SRIKANT, CGC FOR R4;
NOTICE TO R5 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 28.08.2026)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO. ISSUE AN ORDER, DIRECTION, WRIT OR ANY APPROPRIATE ORDER, WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010505422026 NC: 2026:KHC:46593 WP No. 23016 of 2026
TO TERMINATE KSK RETAIL OUTLET DEALERSHIP WITH THE 5TH RESPONDENT AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Ms. Aiswaraya Hegde, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent nos.1 to 3. Sri. Mahesh Arkalgud, learned CGC accepts notice for Respondent no.4.
2. Notice to respondent no.5 is dispensed with in view of proposed order to be passed.
3. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue an order, direction, writ or any appropriate
order, writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to terminate KSK Retail Outlet Dealership with the 5th respondent. b. Issue an order, direction, writ or any appropriate
order, writ in the nature of mandamus directing the 5th respondent to restore possession of the Schedule Property to the petitioner. c. Issue an order, direction, writ or any appropriate
order, or an order to the respondents 3 to 4 to cease supply of petroleum, remove underground tanks, other equipment form the Schedule Property. d. Issue an order, direction, writ or any appropriate
order, writ in the nature of mandamus directing the 4th respondent to initiate necessary action against the 5th respondent in accordance with the
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010505422026 NC: 2026:KHC:46593 WP No. 23016 of 2026
Petroleum Act, 1934 read with the Petroleum Rules, 2002. e. Such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner, who is the landowner on which respondent no.5 is running a petrol bunk, has not been considered. The contention taken in the representation is that there is no right for respondent no.5 to run the said petrol bunk since the petitioner/landowner has objected to such use of the land after the expiry of the license.
5. Even if that be so, a representation of this nature cannot be considered. The rules provided under Rule 150 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002, for a particular application to be filed. If such an application is filed by the petitioner before the Deputy Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner is directed to consider the same and pass necessary orders.
6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28