Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37728 (MAD)

TRIVENI INFRA v. State Tax officer

WP/21530/2026 · 2026-06-17

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21530 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21530 of 2026 and W.M.P. Nos.23306 and 23307 of 2026 Triveni Infra Rep by its Partner J.Mohan, No.1 and 2, Ambattur Flats, Redhills Road, Ambattur, Chennai- 600 053. ..Petitioner Vs State Tax Officer Commercial Taxes Department, Ambattur Assessment Circle, 3rd Floor, Room No.323, Integrated Building for Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling upon the records of the impugned order issued by the Respondent in GSTN 33AARFT0395A1Z9/2021,-22 dated 22.12.2025 along with order and summary of order in FORM GST DRC 07 bearing reference No.ZD3312253322303 dated 22.12.2025, quash the same and consequently remand the matter to the Respondent directing them to entertain the records, documents and reply from the Petitioner and then pass order after affording a personal hearing to the Petitioner. For Petitioner: Ms.Rukmani Venugopalan For Respondent: Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21530 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 22.12.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent. 3. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 10% of the disputed tax demand. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 17.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21530 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To The State Tax Officer, Commercial Taxes Department, Ambattur Assessment Circle, 3rd Floor, Room No.323, Integrated Building for Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21530 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 21530 of 2026 17.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis