- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010412592015 NC: 2026:KHC:46397 MFA No. 6838 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6838 OF 2015 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SRI. CHARANRAJ AGED 30 YEARS S/O CHANDRASHEKAR BHANDARY R/AT POTTUKERE HOUSE, BALPA VILLAGE & POST, SULLIA TALUK - 574 232. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PUNDIKAI ISHWARA BHAT, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. CHANDRASEKHAR AGED 41 YEARS S/O MOHANDAS R/AT 117, PARWATHIMAKKE, SUBRHAMANYA , SULLIA TLAUK, D.K. - 574 238. 2. THE FURTHERE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., UNIT NO.201, 202, 2ND FLOOR, INLAND AVENUE, M.G. ROAD, BULLALBAGH, MANGALORE - 575 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010412592015 NC: 2026:KHC:46397 MFA No. 6838 of 2015 3. ADAM K. AGED 49 YEARS S/O LATE ABDUL KHADER @ KHADER BEARY R/AT KEBKADI HOUSE, AIVATHOKKUDU VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 239. 4. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., MAIN ROAD, PUTTUR, D.K. - 574 201, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. O. MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. K. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. JANARDHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R1 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.3.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.1908/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT, MANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is present. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010412592015 NC: 2026:KHC:46397 MFA No. 6838 of 2015 2. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. 3. On 27.11.2025, it was stated that I.A.No.1/2025 is filed for recall of the order dated 04.06.2025. The said I.A came to be dismissed. On the same day, cost of Rs.1,000/- was imposed and there was a direction to pay the cost on or before the next date of hearing, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed. Though the said order was passed in the year 2025, the cost has not been paid till date. Therefore, no purpose is served in continuing the same. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1