Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3772 (RAJ)

AMIT KUMAR MITTAL S/O SHRI SURESH CHAND MITTAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3412/2026 · 2026-02-23

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:8320] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3412/2026 Amit Kumar Mittal S/o Shri Suresh Chand Mittal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Behind Telephone Exchange, Bhagwati Nagar, Hindaun City, Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principle Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Director (Non- Gazetted) Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Medical Directorate, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Director (Administrator), Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Medical Directorate, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshit Parashar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 23/02/2026 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the orders dated 26.10.2016 and 23.04.2016, whereby the candidature of the petitioner in recruitment for the post of Lab Technician was rejected on the ground that the qualification acquired by him was not included in the eligibility clause. 2. Thus, clearly cause of action, if any, accrued to file this writ petition in the year 2016, however, no justification, much less than sufficient cause, has been given by the petitioner for filing this petition after lapse of more than 9 years from the date of [2026:RJ-JP:8320] (2 of 2) [CW-3412/2026] accrual of cause of action. It is settled proposition of law that writ jurisdiction is a discretionary and equitable remedy and cannot be invoked by any person, who was not vigilant about his rights. Apparently, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is suffering from delay and laches, hence, is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /75