1 CGHC010300212021 2026:CGHC:41905 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4690 of 2021 1 - Rajendra Kumar Patel S/o Late Khiya Singh Patel Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Matiya, Tahsil Than Khamariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, P. O. Raklhi, Nava Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Durg Division, District Durg Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - The Naib Tahsildar Than Khamariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 5 - Chhattisgarh Rajya Lodhi Samaj District Durg, Through Its Presedent, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 26/09/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “A. That the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records of the case for its kind perusal, in the ends of justice. B. That, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari setting aside/quashing both the impugned order dated 17.06.2021 (Ann. P-1) passed by Respondent No. 2/ The Commissioner, Durg Division, Dist. Durg and the impugned Recovery Notice dated 22.10.2021 (Ann. P-2) issued by the Respondent No. 4/ Naib Tahsildar, Than Khamariya, Dist. Bemetara being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, and if the Hon'ble High Court thinks it fit and proper then the matter may be remanded back to the respondent No. 2 for reconsideration of the matter and pass fresh appropriate order after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in the ends of justice. C. That the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to award the cost of the petition and any other alternative, additional writ in favour of the petitioner in the ends of justice.” 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions from the petitioner in the matter. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. In view of above submission, the petition is dismissed for want of instructions. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat