Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37700 (CAL)

BANITA DAS v. ARIJIT DAS

FAT/12/2025 · 2026-09-02

Ravi Krishan Kapur, Supratim Bhattacharya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18 02.09.2026 Court No.11 J.Das CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE SIDE FAT 12 of 2025 Smt. Banita Das VS Sri Arijit Das Mr. Subhasish Mishra Mr. Rounak ghosh …For the appellant Ms. Suman Sehanabis Mr. Salok Sah Ms. Anwesha Chakraborty …For the respondent 1. An adjournment is prayed for the Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant. By an order dated 20 May 2025, a Co-ordinate Bench had granted directions for filing of Paper Books and for transmission of the records of the Trial Court Records. 2. It appears from the Report filed by the Department that despite notice of arrival of the Trial Court Records being served on the Advocates appearing on behalf of the appellant as far back as on 20 May 2025 no steps have been taken whatsoever by the appellant. The time to file the Paper Books had also been extended on 30 July 2026, notwithstanding such directions the appellant has taken no steps in the matter. 3. In view of the casual and indolent attitude of the appellant, FAT 12 of 2025 stands dismissed for non- prosecution. [Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.] [Supratim Bhattacharya, J.]