Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37694 (PNJ)

MAHENDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/28205/2026 · 2026-09-02

Divya Sharma, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-28205-2026 1 112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28205-2026 Date of decision :02.09.2026 Mahender Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present :- Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate and Mr. Monit Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the order passed by the learned Court of Collector, Bhiwani dated 24.08.2017 (Annexure P-8) as well as impugned order (Annexure P- 10) dated 18.09.2018 passed by the Court of learned Commissioner Rohtak, Rohtak Range, District Rohtak. Further prayer has been made for directing the Revenue authority to consider the claim of the petitioner and on the basis of documents available on the case file, the petitioner may be declared owner and in possession over the suit land and for staying the operation of impugned orders (Annexures P-8 and P-10). DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.09.04 15:44 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-28205-2026 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, at the outset, has submitted that against the impugned order, revision is maintainable under Section 13-AA(2) of the Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 before the Financial Commissioner, whereas in the present petition, it has been stated that there is no alternate remedy. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail an alternative remedy in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (DIVYA SHARMA) JUDGE September 02, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.09.04 15:44 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment