Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
111
CRWP-9198-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 02.09.2026
Kuldeep Kumar
…Petitioner
V/s State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ravi Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab.
*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members and to conduct a fair and impartial inquiry/investigation in FIR No.128, dated 12.07.2026 registered at Police Station Punjab Agriculture University under Sections 333, 115(2), 118(1), 191(3), 190, 324 (4), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘the BNS’) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 in which his son has been falsely implicated.
2.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted representation dated 13.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.3 for redressal of his grievances but no action has been taken upon the same.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
VIKAS CHANDER 2026.09.03 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-9198-2026 (O&M)
-2-
5.
I have considered the matter.
6.
Without further going into the merits of the case, petition in hand is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to look into the representation dated 13.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) and decide the same in accordance with law.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE September 02, 2026 vcgarg
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2026.09.03 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document