Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37688 (KAR)

SRI.RAYAPPA SUNDER RAJ v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/30040/2024 · 2026-08-25

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010635852024 NC: 2026:KHC:46200 WP No. 30040 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 30040 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAYAPPA SUNDER RAJ S/O LATE A. RAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT NO.5311, 254TH STREET, LITTLE NECK, NEW YORK – 11362. 2. SRI. RAYAPPA KANTHARAJ S/O LATE A. RAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.141-02, 45TH AVE FLUSHING, NEWYORK – 11355. 3. SRI. RAYAPPA AROGYACHARI S/O LATE A. RAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.329, HERRICKS ROAD, NEW HYDE PARK, NEWYORK – 11040. 4. SRI. RAYAPPA KASTHURI RAJ S/O LATE A. RAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.9517, 243RD STREET, FLORAL PARK, NEWYORK – 11001. 5. SRI. RAYAPPA DEVAKUMAR S/O LATE A. RAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.9517 243RD STREET, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010635852024 NC: 2026:KHC:46200 WP No. 30040 of 2024 FLORAL PARK, NEWYORK – 11001. 6. SRI. RAYAPPA RAJKUMAR S/O LATE A. RAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.89-48, 199TH STREET HOLLIS, NEWYORK – 11423. 7. SRI. RAYAPPA SATISH S/O LATE A. RAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.34, HOFFMAN ROAD, NEW HYDE PARK, NEWYORK – 11040. PETITIONERS 1 TO 7 ARE REP. BY THEIR GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY. SRI. ARUN KUMAR F. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE FRANCIS LUCUS, R/AT NO.24/1, 1ST CROSS, CUBBON PET, BENGALURU – 560 002. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H.J. KARIGAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS, REVENUE BUILDING, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE INQUISITOR/ENQUIRY OFFICER TOWN SURVEY TEAM-3, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010635852024 NC: 2026:KHC:46200 WP No. 30040 of 2024 DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR LAND RECORDS CITY SURVEY AND SETTLEMENT, BENGALURU SOUTH DIVISION, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS, CITY SURVEY AND SETTLEMENT TEAM-3, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. 5. THE SURVEY OFFICER, CITY SURVEY AND SETLEMENT TEAM-3, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. 6. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, OPP. TO LIC BUILDING, NEAR TOWN HALL, 3RD FLOOR, ANNEX BUILDING-3, HUDSON CIRCLE, N.R. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002. 7. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, J.C. ROAD, KEMPEGOWDA NAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 002. 8. THE REVENUE OFFICER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, KEMPEGWODA NAGARA SUB-DIVISION, - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010635852024 NC: 2026:KHC:46200 WP No. 30040 of 2024 CORPORATION BUILDING 1ST FLOOR, BEHIND H. SIDDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002. 9. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAARA PALIKE N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R5; SRI. ARAVIND M. NEGLUR, ADVOCATE FOR R6 TO R9) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH NOTICE BEARING NO.CTS(B) REVISION 2/2024-25 DATED 21ST OCTOBER, 2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS ILLEGAL, UNSUSTAINABLE AND WITHOUT JURISDICTION; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners are challenging the Proceedings in Revision No.02/2024-25 pending before the respondent No.2 in terms of Notice dated 21st October, 2024 (Annexure-A). 2. Heard Sri. H.J. Karigar, learned counsel appearing for petitioners; Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010635852024 NC: 2026:KHC:46200 WP No. 30040 of 2024 Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 5; and Sri. Aravind M. Neglur, learned counsel appearing for respondents 6 to 9. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, it is forthcoming that the respondent-BBMP preferred revision petition before the respondent No.3 in the impugned proceedings challenging the order passed by the respondent No.2 herein. In that view of the matter, it is open for the petitioners herein to appear before the respondent No.3 and adjudicate their right in accordance with law. Therefore, I am of the view that, no interference be called for in this petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15