Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37682 (CAL)

MRINAL KANTI PAUL AND ANR v. SONGITA DAS GUPTA AND ANR

CO/70/2026 · 2026-08-31

Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31.08.2026 D.L.98 Ct.No. 655 pp C.O. 70 of 2026 Sri Mrinal Kanti Paul & Anr. Vs. Smt. Songita Das Gupta & Anr. Mr. Abhilash Chatterjee, Ms. Najmee Parveen ….for the petitioners. 1. Learned advocate representing the petitioners is present. 2. It is said by the learned advocate for the petitioners that her clients do not want to proceed further with the present case due to subsequent development in connection with both the suits. It is further contended that the present suits have become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the instant revisional application be and the same is dismissed as non-prosecution. 4. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Trial Court. 5. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on payment of requisite fees. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)