MANOJ KUMAR MANGAL v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ROSHNABAD HARIDWAR
WPMB/402/2025 · 2026-04-22
Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3767 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3767 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:2943-DB
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY
22nd April, 2026
Writ Petition (M/B) 402 of 2025
Manoj Kumar Mangal
------Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Commissioner, (A)-2, State Tax, Haridwar (Uttarakhand), State Tax Office, Roshnabad, Haridwar
-----Respondent
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:-
Mr. Raghav Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)
1.
The writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs: (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned letter, being reference no. ZD050724011931N, dated 26.07.2024 issued by respondent (Annexure No. 4 to this writ petition). (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned
order undated passed by respondent (Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition)
1
2026:UHC:2943-DB
2.
Mr. Raghav Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner, after making his submissions, prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of statutory appeal.
3.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in terms of above.
4.
Pending application, if any, also stands
disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 22.04.2026 Kaushal
2