CWP-27469-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 CWP-27469-2026 Date of decision: 27.08.2026 RAVINDER SINGH ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVINDRA SINGH CHAUHAN Present: - Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Harkirat Singh Randhawa, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1. Mr. Harkirat Singh Randhawa, Advocate has caused appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.3 and 4 and filed Memorandum of Appearance, which is taken on the record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and approve the building plan submitted by the petitioner for reconstruction of his shops and to restrain the respondents from interfering in his lawful ownership and possession over the land situated within Abadi Deh, Khasra No.1233, Raikot, District Ludhiana. 3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4 submitted that a representation was given by the petitioner to the Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana, vide Annexure P-11, which was forwarded to the respondent – POONAM RANI 2026.08.31 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-27469-2026 -2- Municipal Council and the Municipal Council had taken a decision on the aforesaid complaint registered by the petitioner. He further submitted that the complaint had been closed and the petitioner had been informed regarding the same. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he had not received any order from the Municipal Council. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that no order of Municipal Council has been produced, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 - Municipal Council to consider the grievance of the petitioner in Annexure P-11, which has already been forwarded to them. The respondent, after hearing the petitioner or his counsel, will pass a speaking order in accordance with law which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two months from today. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (PRAVINDRA SINGH CHAUHAN) 27.08.2026 JUDGE P. Seth i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No POONAM RANI 2026.08.31 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document