- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010187492020 NC: 2026:KHC:47255 CRL.P No. 3030 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3030 OF 2020 BETWEEN: DHYAN FOUNDATION GORAKSHA TRUST M H PATNA GUBBI DIST: TUMKUR - 572 216. HAVING REGISTRATION NO.HLS-4-00258-2015-16 THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SMT.RASHMI JAYAKUMAR OCCUPATION: VOLUNTEER AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. …PETITIONER [BY SRI ANUPAM AGARWAL, ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SUB INSPECTOR BAGEPALLI P.S., CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 561 207. REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SHAIKH MUHAMMED RAFEE 26-143-3 CHIGURUMANUPETA DHONE KURNOOL ANDHRA PRADESH - 518 222. 3. SHAIKH SAKINABI DHONE KURNOOL ANDHRA PRADESH - 518 222. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010187492020 NC: 2026:KHC:47255 CRL.P No. 3030 of 2020 4. S NAZEER HUSSEN SAB NO.61, BEHIND COURT COMPOUND, COUNCILOR SADIA STREET, SANTOSH NAGAR, WARD NO.18, SIDLAGHATTA TOWN, DIST: CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 105 KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1; SRI CHOKKA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R2 & R3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED IN CR.NO.310/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED COURT OPF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BAGEPALLI ON 17.10.2019 AND THE ORDER CONFIRMED IN CRL.RP.NO.88/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED COURT OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA PASSED ON 16.03.2020. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Matter was passed over and called again. Learned HCGP for respondent no.1-State and learned counsel for respondent no.2 are present. 2. None appears for petitioner. Even on earlier occasion, absence on behalf of petitioner was noted. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010187492020 NC: 2026:KHC:47255 CRL.P No. 3030 of 2020 3. Continued absence would indicate that petitioner is not pursuing matter diligently. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23