Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37655 (CHH)

VIKAS KHANDEKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/161/2025 · 2026-09-25

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas, Shri Sudhir Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 WPCR No. 161 of 2025 CGHC010102642025 2026:CGHC:41935-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 161 of 2025  Vikas Khandekar S/o Vyas Narayan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Daupara Mungeli, Police Station- Mungeli, District- Mungeli (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Ministry of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Superintendent of Police Mungeli, District- Mungeli (C.G.). 3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Police) Mungeli, District- Mungeli (C.G.). 4. Station House Officer, Police Station - Mungeli, District - Mungeli (C.G.). ... Respondents For Petitioner :- Ms. Divya Sahu, appears on behalf of Mr. Rajeev Kuamr Dubey, Advocate. For State :- Mr. Saumya Rai, Dy. Government Advocate. (Division Bench) (Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, Hon’ble Shri Justice Sudhir Kumar) Order on Board 26.09.2026 1. Heard. 2. By way of this writ petition petitioner has challenged memo dated ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH 2 WPCR No. 161 of 2025 02.12.2024 (Annexure P/3) by which the name of the petitioner herein has been included in the list of Polictical Gunda (Political Goons) by Superintendent of Police, Mungeli. On the earlier date of hearing, this Court has directed the State to re-examine the said list and in pursuance of the said direction, the name of the petitioner has been deleted from the list of Political Gunda (Political Goons), however, included the name of petitioner in the list of Gunda (Goons) by the Superintendent of Police. 3. Since the grievance has already been redressed as prayed by the petitioner in the writ petition as the name of the petitioner has already been deleted from the list of Political Gunda (Political Goons), this petition has become infructuous. However, liberty is granted to petitioner to take recourse available under the law by challenging subsequent order passed by the Superintendent of Police, Mungeli, vide memo dated 19.09.2026. 4. With the aforesaid observation/direction the instant writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge (Sudhir Kumar) Judge Ankit