Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37648 (PAT)

Nawal Sharma v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/14982/2025 · 2026-02-10

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14982 of 2025 ====================================================== Nawal Sharma S/o Mahavir Sharma, R/o- Bari Paikant Ward 10, Paikant, Jamalpur, Gogri, P.O.- Deotha, District- Khagaria, Pin- 851203. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar. 2. The Principal/Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Khagaria. 4. The Additional Collector, Khagaria. 5. The Circle Officer, Gogri, Khagaria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 10-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) The order dated 05.05.2025 passed in connection with Jamabandi Case No. 231/2024- 25 (Annexure 2 pg 11) may kindly be quashed, as the same is having no sanction of law at all. ii. The petitioner's case may kindly directed to be looked into/adjudicated in the light of Maya Devi &Ors (since reported in 2014 (4) BBCJ V-152), and other judicial pronouncement Patna High Court CWJC No.14982 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 like Arun Kumar Goenka case (since reported in 2023 (5) BLJ 321) and other similar matter in the interest of justice. iii. Till the settlement of the dispute the petitioner's right, title and possession couldn't be allowed to disturb in any manner. iv. Any Other relief or reliefs may kindly be allowed, for which the petitioner be found entitle in the opinion of this Hon'ble Court.” 3. On 23.09.2025, an order was passed to remove the defect(s) within a period of three weeks. 4. As it was a peremptory order and the defect(s) was not removed, it got dismissed on 14.10.2025. 5. Perused the file and the same stands consigned. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U