$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5614/2026, CM APPL. 27520/2026 and CM APPL. 27521/2026 MS LUNAR CONSULTANTS AND DEVELOPERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhadresh Harikant, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Mr. Siddhartha Goswami, Mr. Krish Bhatia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 29.04.2026 1. The only contention of the learned counsel representing the Petitioner is that the Petitioner‟s technical bid has been rejected by the Respondents without disclosing any reason. 2. Learned counsel representing the Respondents submits that there is no objection to supplying the reasons for the rejection of the Petitioner‟s technical bid. 3. In view of the above, the present Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents to supply the reasons for rejecting the Petitioner‟s technical bid within a period of one week from today. 4. All the pending applications also stand disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. AMIT MAHAJAN, J. APRIL 29, 2026 jai/pal This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:39:57