CRM-M-48141-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 CRM-M-48141-2026 Decided on: 27.08.2026 Manoj Kumar and another …...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana …...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Lalit Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG Haryana Mr. Abhay Bhardwaj, Advocate for the complainant **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in this second petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out FIR No.0107 dated 12.05.2026, registered under Sections 115(2), 190, 191(3), 351(3) (Section 118(2) of BNS added later on), at Police Station Sector-14, Panchkula, District Panchkula. 2. First anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners i.e. CRM-M- 42210-2026 was dismissed by passing a detailed order dated 07.08.2026 (Annexure P-9) by Coordinate Bench of this Court (Surya Partap Singh, J.). 3. Developing some new arguments, present petition is again filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as if any number of petitions, without there being a fresh cause of action can be filed by the accused. Merely with the change of counsel or the bench for hearing, any such fresh petition(s) can not be REENA 2026.08.27 20:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-48141-2026 2 entertained. 4. Thus, instant second petition for pre-arrest bail is dismissed. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 27.08.2026 JUDGE reena Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO REENA 2026.08.27 20:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document