1 CGHC010379692026 2026:CGHC:42147 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7127 of 2026 Ku. Mamta Tawari D/o Late Shri Achal Das Tiwari, Aged About 52 Years Presently Posted As Tehsildar Durg, Jila Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mantralya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Durg Collectorate Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. 3 - Shri Saurabh Chourasia Tehsildar Narayanpur District Narayanpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Through, Its Secretary General Administration Department Mantrlaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amrito Das, Senior Advocate (through VC) assisted by Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Dy. GA. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 28/09/2026 1. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's brother, namely, Mr. Deepak Tawari, is suffering from severe blood RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.09.29 10:36:12 +0530 2 cancer and that the petitioner is the only person available to take care of him. He would submit that, vide the impugned order, the petitioner has been transferred to Narayanpur on administrative grounds. Though the petitioner has already approached respondent No.4 by filing a representation seeking reconsideration of the transfer order and posting of the petitioner at a nearby place on the aforesaid ground, the same is pending consideration. He would further submit that the present petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, taking into consideration the grievance raised therein. 2. Learned counsel for the State would submit that, if the representation of the petitioner is pending, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law as well as the applicable Transfer Policy, within a period of thirty days. 3. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide the pending representation submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law and the applicable Transfer Policy, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul