Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37613 (PNJ)

SHAMMI KAPOOR SAINI v. STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT PUNJAB

CWP/28074/2026 · 2026-09-02

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-28074-2026 Date of decision : 02.09.2026 Shammi Kapoor Saini ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to join his duties and further to pay the due salary and other benefits from 21.10.2023 onwards. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner has also submitted representation dated 10.02.2026 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents which is still pending consideration. She further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the said representation, by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, D.A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.09.03 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-28074-2026 -2- 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. 6. Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide representation dated 10.02.2026 (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioner expeditiously, by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to the petitioner. (NAMIT KUMAR) 02.09.2026 JUDGE kothiyal Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.09.03 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document