GAGAN RAJBANSI @ CHAND RAJBANSI @ GAGAN RAJBANSHI @ CHAND RAJBANSHI AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/1718/2026 · 2026-09-01
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37613 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37613 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
01.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.305. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (M) 1718 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Suti Police Station case no. 134 of 2026 dated 11.02.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)3(5)/324/329(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and adding Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Gagan Rajbansi @ Chand Rajbansi @ Gagan Rajbanshi @ Chand Rajbanshi & Anr. ……Petitioners. Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Suman Bhanja
.....for the Petitioners. Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Mr. Ansuman Bera
……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that petitioners and the father of the deceased are brothers and there was a property dispute, particularly, for demarcation of boundary. At the spur of the moment petitioners struck with a bamboo which resulted in serious injuries and subsequently the deceased succumbed to the injuries after a period of four days. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that recklessly the deceased was assaulted and the injuries are grievous, as such the bail of the petitioners should be rejected. I have taken into account the overall materials appearing in the Case Diary, considering the fact that the genesis of dispute related to property, there was a relationship existing between the
2 parties and the fact that the deadly weapon which has been referred to is a bamboo stick in the present case along with the fact that the intention was not to kill the person but to injure the person, I am of the view that petitioner be released on bail on stringent conditions. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioners, namely, Gagan Rajbansi @ Chand Rajbansi @ Gagan Rajbanshi @ Chand Rajbanshi and Kusu Rajbansi @ Kushudhaj Rajbansi @ Kusu Rajbanshi @ Kushudhaj Rajbanshi shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jangipur, Murshidabad.
If on bail, the petitioners shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (M) No. 1718 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)