Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:15898 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2679 of 2020 Shiv Kumar Chandrakar S/o Bhukhan Lal Aged About 67 Years R/o Village Chatera, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary State Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Divisional Officer Mandhar Branch, Sub Division Arang, Water Resources Department, Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Tahsildar, Arang District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Manager Cooperative Societies, Village Bhilai (For The Registration Of Paddy), Tahsil Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondents WPC No. 2684 of 2020 Mani Ram S/o Bhukhan Lal, Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Chatera, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
---Petitioner Versus YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.04.08 10:27:33 +0530
2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, 2 - Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Divisional Officer, Mandhar Branch, Sub Division Arang, Water Resources Department, Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - Tahsildar, Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 7 - Manager, Cooperative Societies, Village Bhilai (For The Registration Of Paddy), Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Arpit Agrawal, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge
Order on Board 07.04.2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, by efflux of time and in view of subsequent developments, the instant petitions have been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned State counsel fairly concurs with the said submission.
3. In view of the above, as nothing survives for adjudication, both the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Yogesh