Binod Kumar Rai @ Bina Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./58125/2025 · 2026-01-12
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37580 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37580 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58125 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Binod Kumar Rai @ Bina Kumar Rai S/o Jaideo Rai Resident of village- Chakka Ishapur, PS- Bhagwanpur, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash For the State : Mr. Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 12-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 216 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(3)(5) of the BNS. 3. As per the prosecution story, informant’s daughter was frequently tortured over the past six years due to infertility. On 27.07.2024, four sister-in-laws (gotnis) and brother-in-law (bhaisur) of the informant’s daughter killed her by hanging. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that there is no allegation of demand of dowry. So far as allegation of infliction of mental torture is concerned, that is not against the petitioner rather it is against four gotnis (sisters-in-law) and the bhaisur (brother-in-law) of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58125 of 2025(4) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 deceased. He has also submitted that the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and is under custody since 14.04.2025 i.e. for near about nine months. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. The FIR itself shows that there is no allegation against the petitioner and he is in custody for near about nine months. 7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 216 of 2024, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.
priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T