1 CGHC010355242026 2026:CGHC:42236 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8580 of 2026 • Sandeep Kashyap Son Of Late Chamra Kashyap, Aged About 32 Years Resident Of Village Garhvat Ward No. 16 Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station Hirri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate For State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28.09 .2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 146/2026 registered at Police Station Hirri, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS. 2. complainant lodged a report at Police Station Hirri alleging that some unknown persons had stolen four truck wheels and the disk of a truck from Jhalfa Vishwakarma Garage. During course of inquiry, the present applicant was arrested for aforesaid offences. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.09.29 10:28:30 +0530 2 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge-sheet has already been filed, applicant is in jail since 16.06.2026 and co-accuseds have already been granted bail by the learned trial Court. He would further contend that though there are three criminal antecedents against the present applicant, which are pending consideration but all have been explained properly. He would further submit that two cases were registered for commission of offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 325, 34 and 506 of Indian Penal Code in the year 2020 and 2022 and one case was registered in the year 2023. He would pray for grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the applicant has properly explained his criminal history in Column 4(a) of the bail application, charge-sheet has been filed, the applicant is in jail since 16.06.2026, and the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the learned trial Court, I am inclined to allow this bail application. 7. Accordingly, the regular bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- (i) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any 3 person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court; (ii) he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, & (iii) he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant