Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3758 (CHH)

SNEH LATA MASIH v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1529/2026 · 2026-04-06

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15771 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1529 of 2026 Sneh Lata Masih W/o Prakash Masih Aged About 79 Years R/o Jaijaipur, Tehsil Jaijaipur, District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Superintendent Of Police District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Station House Officer Police Station Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Tahsildar Jaijaipur District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Kamta Prasad S/o Kishno Yadav Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Jaijaipur, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Virendra Verma, Advocate For Respondents 1 to 4/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Govt. Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 07.4.2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 That, the Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to comply the order passed in Annexure P-1 (Colly) and evict the illegal encroacher. BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.04.08 16:54:18 +0530 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take decision over the grievance of the petitioner within 10 days and execute the order of the lower Court below. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach executing Court for redressal of the grievance of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if the above prayer of the petitioner is allowed. 4. On due consideration, the prayer is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as sought for. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini