Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3758 (AP)

Dr ANUMULA VAMSHI KRISHNA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5422/2025 · 2026-06-24

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010098252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 5422/2025 Between: 1. DR ANUMULA VAMSHI KRISHNA, ADVOCATE, HNO 1-91, NETHAJI CENTRE, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AG OFFICE, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, NELAPADU, GUNTUR. 3. DAMMALAPATI SRINIVAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC ADVOCATE GENERAL, FLAT NO.509, BLOCK-3, DIVYA SAKTHI APATRMENTS, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD-16, STATE OF TELANGANA. 4. A JAYANTH, W/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, R/O FLAT 101, BRUNDAVANAM APARTMENTS, SRINIVASA NAGAR COLONY, ROAD NO.7, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 NJS,J W.P No.5422 of 2025 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO calling upon the 4th respondent to reveal before this Court under what authority of law, she is holding the post of Government Pleader in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, since she is appointed without following due process of law and have to be treated as an usurper of a public office and declare the appointment of the 4th respondent to the post of Government Pleader as void ab initio thereby set aside the GO Rt. No 309 dated 18.08.2024 as illegal, irregular, irrational and arbitrary, contrary to clause 13 of Andhra Pradesh Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Instructions, 2000 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently suspend the appointment of the 4th respondent vide GO Rt.No 309 dated 18.08.2024 as Government Pleader and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the appointment of the 4th respondent vide GO Rt.No: 309 dated 18.08.2024 as Government Pleader in the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BALAIAH B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS 2. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY The Court made the following: 3 NJS,J W.P No.5422 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: 1. Perused the docket proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner is not available, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue the Writ Petition. 4. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution. 5. No order as to costs. 6. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date: 25.06.2026 CM✓/PS/APS – chs Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ✔ 4 NJS,J W.P No.5422 of 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 95 WRIT PETITION No.5422 of 2025 Dated:25.06.2026 chs