HI TECH DESIGNER WORLD v. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER II
WP/21871/2026 · 2026-06-18
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37579 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37579 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 21871 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21871 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.23716 of 2026 Hi Tech Designer World Rep. by its proprietor, Suseela, D/o. Rangasamy, No. 2/150A, Mount, Kattupakkam,Poonamallee High Road, Tiruvallur, Chennai 56 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer II Poonamallee Assessment circle, No. 4/109 third Floor, Bangalore Chennai highway Varadarajapuram, Nazarathpet Chennai 123 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Respondent vide his order in GSTIN No. 33BMQPS9305D1ZU dated 19.12.2025 and summary of the order in FORM GST DRC-07 Ref. No. ZD331225310508Q /2021-2022 dated 19.12.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Chinnasamy V https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 21871 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ********** ORDER An order dated 19.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 21871 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
18-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Deputy State Tax Officer II Poonamallee Assessment circle, No. 4/109 third Floor, Bangalore Chennai highway Varadarajapuram, Nazarathpet, Chennai 123 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 21871 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 21871 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.23716 of 2026 18-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis