1 CGHC010363752026 2026:CGHC:42461 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1270 of 2026 1 - M/s. Rishabh Rice Mill (wrongly mentioned in the Ordersheet as ‘M/s Hrishabh Rice Mill) (Mill Regn, No. MA 703999) Kosir Road, Rambhantha, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) Through its Proprietor- Shivkumar Tandan, S/o. Shri Labhoram Tandan, Aged About 44 Years, R/o. Village Chanamuda, Post Chantipali, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Managing Director (MD), C.G. State Marketing Federation Limited, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector (Food Cell) District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - General Manager, C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Head Quarter Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Marketing Officer (DMO), Office of District Marketing Office, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C .G.) 7 - Collector District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1, 3 and 7 : Ms. Supriya Upasane, Govt. Advocate. Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.09.30 11:01:44 +0530 2 For Respondents No.2, 4 and 5 : Ms. Astha Shukla, Advocate, on advance copy. For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate, on advance copy. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 29-09-2026 1. After arguing some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a duly constituted writ petition. 2. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the opposite counsels who are appearing for respective respondents on advance copy. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the annexures to the learned counsel for the petitioner, after retaining its attested true copy in record. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil