1 CGHC010333522026 2026:CGHC:42396-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 854 of 2026 Sanjeev Agrawal S/o Raghunandan Agrawal Aged About 57 Years, Government Member, Central Jail Raipur And Ex- Member Divisional Railway Consumer Advisory Committee, R/o 20, In Front Of Vanijya Bhawan, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare And Medical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan Nawa Raipur, Distt- Raipur (C.G 2 - The Director, Health Services, Sector- 19, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Divisional Joint Director Health Services, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector, Distt- Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 5 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer Distt- Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 6 - Preetam Kewat Post Store Keeper, Health Department, Distt- Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 7 - Shri K.K. Verma Post Compounder, Health Department, Distt- Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 8 - Shri Rahul Jaiswal Post Medical Lab Technologist Health Department, Distt- Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 9 - Dr. Devendra Singh Paikra, Post In Charge Civil Surgeon, Distt- Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 10 - Dr. Prabhat Chandra Prabhakar Community Health Center, Bilha District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Wrongly Mentioned As Dr. Prabhat Prabhakar Chandra In The Cause Title Of The Writ Petition ) 2 11 - Dr. I Nageshwar Rao, In Charge Chief Medical And Health Officer, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 12 - Dr. A.I. Minj Post Store In Charge Officer, Health Department, Distt- Gaurela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) ...Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Mayank Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. RK Gupta, Addl AG. Hon'ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Santosh Sharma , Judge Order on Board Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice 29.09.2026 1. The appellant, in this writ appeal, seeks to assail the impugned order dated 09.07.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPC No.3538 of 2026, whereby the writ petition was dismissed holding that in absence of any enforceable legal right, the petitioner/appellant has no locus standi to seek the relief prayed for in the writ petition. 2. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the present appeal. 3. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. D S dSd/-S dSd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Jamal.