Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37556 (MAD)

Tvl S J M Technofab v. The Deputy State Tax Officer 1

WP/21809/2026 · 2026-06-18

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21809 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21809 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.23655 of 2026 Tvl S J M Technofab Rep. by its Proprietor Mr.Muraleedharan , 47, Mani Raja Kalyana Mandapam,Thanner Thottam street, Ondipudhur,Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641016. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 singanallur north assessment circle, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Impugned Assessment Order in Ref. No. ZD3312250969344 dated 06.12.2025 under Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 and uploaded the same along with the summary of order in DRC07 for the Financial Year 2021-22 from the files of the respondent herein, QUASH the same. For Petitioner(s): Ms.H.Shridevi for MRS.Aparna Nandakumar For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21809 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 06.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21809 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 18-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 singanallur north assessment circle, coimbatore, Tamilnadu. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21809 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 21809 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.23655 of 2026 18-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis