Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37536 (MAD)

M/s. SRI RAGAM FIBRE INDUSTRIES v. State Tax Officer

WP/21925/2026 · 2026-06-18

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21925 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21925 of 2026 and W.M.P. No.23773 of 2026 M/s. Sri Ragam Fibre Industries Rep. By its Proprietor Palanisamy Chennimalai, 240/1cb, , Ammaigoundenur, Kanjampatti Post, Pollachi, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 642 003 ..Petitioner Vs State Tax Officer Office of the Commercial Tax Officer Pollachi (East) Pollachi Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the respondent in the order vide GSTIN33AKIPP4319H1Z6/2021-2022 dated 18.12.2025 along with the consequential summary order under section 73 of TNGST/CGST Act, 2017 issued vide FORM GST DRC-07 Ref. No. ZD331225290891A dated 18.12.2025 for the financial year 2021 to 2022, to quash the same. For Petitioner: Ms.A.Rithika for M/s.R. Hemalatha For Respondent: Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 18.12.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21925 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 18.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To The State Tax Officer Office of the Commercial Tax Officer Pollachi (East) Pollachi Tamil Nadu. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21925 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 21925 of 2026 18.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis