D/L288 02.09.2026 Bpg. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 1741 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Cyber Crime Police Station Case No.05 of 2026 dated 16.02.2026 under Sections 77/79 of BNS, 2023 and 66E/67/67A of the I.T. Act; Karnabeer Dey @ Kornabir Dey @ Karna Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee Ms. Paramita Mukherjee Mr. D. Mitra Mr. Arka Banerjee Ms. Moumita Pandit Ms. Ritushree Banerjee Ms. S. Dey. ...for the petitioner. Mr. Ayan Basu Mr. Abhinav Rakshit. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for 89 days. There was earlier relationship between the petitioner and the informant and subsequently when the terms became bitter, petitioner has been foisted with the present criminal case. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the present petitioner circulated certain personal photographs of the victim and uploaded the same in social 2 networking sites. Intimation to the service provider reflects the complicity of the present petitioner. So far as the other issues are concerned, certain screen shots have been downloaded, they are certified under Section 63(4) of the BSA. Having considered the overall circumstances, I am of the opinion that although a case has been made out for trial but further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Karnabeer Dey @ Kornabir Dey @ Karna shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Purba Bardhaman. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Purba Bardhaman without the prior permission of the learned trial court. Additionally, the petitioner shall furnish the number of mobile phone he would be using and the details of any social working site to which the petitioner would be a participant. The same would be furnished to the investigating officer of the case who would track and assess regarding the further conduct of the petitioner. Thus, CRM(M)1741 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)