Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3753 (UTT)

IMRAN ALI v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

WPMS/1076/2026 · 2026-04-28

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.1076 of 2026 Imran Ali & another ……….Petitioners Versus District Magistrate and others …..Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. After arguing vehemently for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present writ petition enabling him to avail remedy under the law before the Competent Court. 4. In such view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the liberty is given to the petitioners to avail remedy as available to them under the private law remedy. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 28.04.2026 AK