Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3753 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD KHALID AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/1167/2026 · 2026-05-04

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1167 of 2026 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition purportedly in public interest has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to the respondent-authority to change the name of crossing and install a monument in the memory of a Parm Vir Chakra Awardee. 2. A perusal of the record indicates that the Nagar Palika Parishad passed a resolution on 28.02.2026 for changing the name of the crossing. Whereafter, certain members of the Nagar Palika Parishad sought installation of statue at the said crossing instead of putting up Ashok light. 3. From the record it appears that insofar as setting up of Ashok light is concerned, the said project has been abandoned, however, as to what is to be done at the said crossing, the decision has to be taken by Nagar Palika Parishad. 4. Filing of PIL for the purpose of forcing the Nagar Palika Parishad to take decision in a particular manner, cannot be countenanced. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. May 5, 2026 Sandeep/Sazia Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ishraque Farooqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jagdish Pathak, S.C., Atul Tej Kulshrestha, Chandra Pal, Shiv Kumar Singh (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Mohammad Khalid and another .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 5 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad