MR MUDDURANGAPPA v. ANRIYA GREINBERG APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION
WP/667/2023 · 2026-08-29
Vijaykumar A Patil
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37522 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37522 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010023512023 NC: 2026:KHC:46928 W.P. No.667/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
WRIT PETITION NO.667/2023 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. MUDDURANGAPPA S/O HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
2.
Ms. MEGHANA MUDDURANGAPPA D/O Mr. MUDDURANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/O OF FLAT NO.1002 'ANRIYA GREINBERG' APARTMENTS 13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN ALLALASANDRA NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT GKVK POST, YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560 065.
ALSO AT NO.2097, 8TH MAIN 2ND CROSS, JUDICIAL LAYOUT YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 065.
…PETITIONERS (BY SMT. RASHMI M.R. ADV., [ABSENT])
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010023512023 NC: 2026:KHC:46928 W.P. No.667/2023
AND:
ANRIYA GREINBERG APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION NO.95/2, 13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN ALLALASANDRA, NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT GKVK POST, YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560 065 REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT MR. R. MAHENDRA SINGH S/O RAMA SINGH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO.2204 'ANRIYA GREINBERG' APARTMENTS NO.95/2, 13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN ALLALASANDRA, NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT GKVK POST, YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560 065. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRADEEP NAIK K, ADV.,)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15.12.2022 (ANNEXURE A )PASSED ON I.A. NO. 1 BY THE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH- 18) IN O,S NO.867/2021 & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010023512023 NC: 2026:KHC:46928 W.P. No.667/2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL ORDER
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 27.08.2026. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session.
It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35