Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37522 (KAR)

MR MUDDURANGAPPA v. ANRIYA GREINBERG APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION

WP/667/2023 · 2026-08-29

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010023512023 NC: 2026:KHC:46928 W.P. No.667/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.667/2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MR. MUDDURANGAPPA S/O HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 2. Ms. MEGHANA MUDDURANGAPPA D/O Mr. MUDDURANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/O OF FLAT NO.1002 'ANRIYA GREINBERG' APARTMENTS 13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN ALLALASANDRA NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT GKVK POST, YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560 065. ALSO AT NO.2097, 8TH MAIN 2ND CROSS, JUDICIAL LAYOUT YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 065. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. RASHMI M.R. ADV., [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010023512023 NC: 2026:KHC:46928 W.P. No.667/2023 AND: ANRIYA GREINBERG APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION NO.95/2, 13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN ALLALASANDRA, NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT GKVK POST, YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560 065 REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT MR. R. MAHENDRA SINGH S/O RAMA SINGH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO.2204 'ANRIYA GREINBERG' APARTMENTS NO.95/2, 13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN ALLALASANDRA, NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT GKVK POST, YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560 065. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRADEEP NAIK K, ADV.,) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15.12.2022 (ANNEXURE A )PASSED ON I.A. NO. 1 BY THE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH- 18) IN O,S NO.867/2021 & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010023512023 NC: 2026:KHC:46928 W.P. No.667/2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 27.08.2026. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35