Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3752 (RAJ)

AMIT FATEHPURIA S/O MR. CHOUTHMAL FATEHPURIA v. GANESH RAM BAJIYA S/O MR. TODARAM

CR/82/2026 · 2026-02-25

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:8688] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 82/2026 1. Amit Fatehpuria S/o Mr. Chouthmal Fatehpuria, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 5/203, Kamal Apartment 2, Ram Mandir Ke Pass, Banipark, Jaipur, Dist. Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Mohammed Amin Khokar S/o Mr. Yusuf Khokar, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Near Azad School, Fatehpur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ganesh Ram Bajiya S/o Mr. Todaram, R/o Dhani Bajiyawali, Santhiliya Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Firm M/s Raj Build Homes, Address 108, Paris Point, Collectrate Circle, Banipark, Jaipur, Rajasthan Through Partner Mr. Rajveer Singh S/o Mr. Amar Singh And Mr. Ganesh Ram Bajiya, S/o Mr. Todaram. 3. Mr. Rajveer Singh S/o Amar Singh, R/o 296, Officers Campus, Sirsi Road, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Nagarpalika Srimadhopur, Through Chairman Nagarpalika, Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 5. Sub Registrar, Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 25/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at some length, upon instructions from his clients, submits that due to an unforeseen and bona fide inadvertance, the present revision petition has been filed under Section 115 of CPC instead of a writ [2026:RJ-JP:8688] (2 of 2) [CR-82/2026] petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order by filing a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Permission sought for is granted. 3. Accordingly, the present civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 5. Further, the Registry is directed to return the Vakalatnama and certified copy of the impugned order to the learned counsel for the petitioners, after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-6