Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3752 (KAR)

SRI GOVINDARAJU v. SMT RAJINI

CRL.P/1154/2025 · 2026-04-15

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20281 CRL.P No. 1154 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1154 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI GOVINDARAJU S/O LATE CHENNAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2. SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE CHENNAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 3. SMT. MALA W/O. MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT DOOR NO.2 BABASAHEBARAPALYA, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUKA BENGALURU - 560 060. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JOSHI DATTATRAYA MADHAVA RAO., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT RAJINI W/O GOVINDARJU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20281 CRL.P No. 1154 of 2025 RESIDING AT NO.11, 1ST MAIN ROAD, M.G. NAGAR, SHANKAR MUTT OPP. ANNAPOORNA COLLEGE, BENGALURU - 560 086 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 (FILED U/S.528 BNSS) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.10.2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO.16 VIDE ANNEXURE E AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION IA NO.16 TO ISSUE WITNESS SUMMONS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND TO GIVE EVIDENCE IN RESPECT OF THE USING OF THE MOBILE PHONES OF THE RESPONDENT HEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioners are before this Court calling in question an order dated 15.10.2024 rejecting an Interlocutory Application filed under I.A No.16. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20281 CRL.P No. 1154 of 2025 2. It being an interlocutory order, the petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is not entertainable. The petitioners are at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court as obtaining under Section 29 of the Protection of Women for Domestic Violence Act, 2005. 3. Reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8